Evidence preparation
Organize submissions, literature, study data, and supporting documentation so reviewers can navigate a complex body of material. Track sources and document how information is prepared.
Capability / YouSophia
Regulatory Intelligence, Review and Support
Support the people, information, and processes involved in evaluating complex scientific and regulatory materials.
THE WORK AT A GLANCE
PREPAREOrganize evidenceStudy data, documents and literature
SUPPORTEnable reviewersAnalysis, knowledge and user support
DOCUMENTPreserve contextMethods, sources and findings
Our focus
A stronger foundation for regulatory review
We bring a thoughtful, multidisciplinary approach to the needs of public-sector teams and the people they serve.
01 /
Reviewer support
Help organize evidence, respond to analytical needs, and make information easier for reviewers to use.
02 /
Scientific documentation
Support technical writing, literature synthesis, and the preparation of clear, review-ready materials.
03 /
Knowledge management
Improve the organization, retrieval, and reuse of review artifacts and supporting knowledge.
04 /
Training and service support
Develop practical guidance and learning materials that help staff use tools, data, and processes.
A visual perspective
The review support ecosystem
These connected elements help frame the work and the people it is intended to support.
01Scientific evidence
02Data and tools
03Reviewer expertise
04Documented findings
Illustrative framework; activities depend on mission needs.
A reviewer-centered approach
Support the complete review journey
Scientific review depends on organized evidence, accessible tools, and clear communication among specialists. Support can be tailored to the specific question and review environment.
01 /Intake
Clarify the review question, relevant materials, timelines, and stakeholders.
02 /Organize
Catalog evidence and make supporting data, references, and records easier to find.
03 /Analyze
Support literature review, data exploration, technical writing, and reviewer questions.
04 /Share
Prepare clear, traceable materials and capture knowledge for future use.
In practice
What this work can look like.
Activities are shaped around the mission, the available evidence, and the needs of the people doing the work.
ILLUSTRATIVE OUTPUTS
Evidence inventories, review summaries, user guides, training materials, and documented support requests.
01Prepare structured evidence summaries and research bibliographies for a defined scientific question.
02Document reviewer needs and coordinate technical support for analytical tools and study data.
03Create user guides, reference materials, or training resources for established review workflows.
A closer look
Support designed around reviewers
Review teams rely on accessible evidence, repeatable methods, and timely technical support. The specific mix of services can be aligned to the review stage and the needs of scientific staff.
Analytical and technical assistance
Help clarify a reviewer’s question, identify suitable data, and coordinate statistical programming, visualization, or data curation support. Capture assumptions and limitations alongside the results.
Knowledge and user support
Develop reference guides, maintain structured knowledge resources, and support training on established tools and processes. Feedback from users can inform improvements to materials and services.
Illustrative scenario
Putting the work in context.
When a reviewer needs to compare findings across studies, support could include understanding the question, organizing available datasets, documenting differences in terminology, and preparing analysis outputs for expert interpretation.
Regulatory intelligence
Turn regulatory information into useful knowledge.
A structured intelligence approach helps teams find relevant sources, understand their context, and make information easier to use in scientific and regulatory review.
Source discovery and monitoring
Define the question and identify relevant guidance, scientific literature, and other sources. Record publication details and scope so information can be checked and refreshed.
Comparative analysis
Organize material by topic, date, or source and identify themes, differences, and open questions while preserving the context of the original evidence.
Knowledge delivery
Prepare source-linked briefs, inventories, and comparative matrices for specialist review and continued use.